Blockchain used to be just a hobby project a few years ago, but right now, it's embedded in multiple industries ranging from finance, operations, healthcare data systems, supply chains, and it is even baked into the video games we humans burn hours on. It removed the need for a middleman and put trust into the code and not the coders. In theory and on paper this works well, until the moment it no longer does. That is when things go from interesting to tragic in milliseconds.
Blockchain testing isn't optional here anymore, it is imperative that all these technologies are fully tested from the aspect of a threat actor's point of view.
Contents
When it comes to traditional applications, you push a code, fix and patch, and as we have seen in the news lately it can cripple systems. With traditional applications, you can recover this way but with blockchain it does not work like this.
Smart contracts are computer programs that execute automatically on a blockchain once certain conditions are met. If you were to deploy this to production with bugs, you are out of luck, because most cannot be “patched” once they are deployed. Simple mistakes can liquidate wallets in a matter of seconds. We have seen it happen on multiple platforms time and time again, with millions of dollars lost due to a coder who missed something predeployment.
There is some shining light on this, some of the newer platforms that exist support the ability to upgrade a contract using proxies or voting mechanisms. It is not universal to all though, which is the downfall. When implementing an immutable design, early accuracy is vital, as the state cannot be modified once created.
We continue to evaluate basic functionality, performance, user experience, but Smart Contracts add another level of complexity to testing. The following are checks that also need to be included in the methodology:
The evaluation must also cover gas efficiency, MEV/front-running issues, cross-chain issues, and the specifics of the consensus implementation. The attack surface is extensive and complex to test.
Well, what if you are not using smart contracts and instead you implemented a wallet driven or API driven app? Unlucky for you, you still need to pressure test the plumbing lines. For wallets they need to connect cleanly. What the app sees needs to match what the chain is saying. If your app says one thing but the blockchain disagrees, that is how you lose clients and trust.
Effective and smart contract testing is essential to safeguarding the dependability and security of blockchain applications. You are basically doing a self-examination of self-extracting code. This is what powers decentralized platforms. Unit testing utilizes Hardhat, Truffle, or Foundry to validate the individual functions while integration tests confirm that the contracts place nicely with one another. If you are looking to hunt down known vulnerabilities you can leverage security tools like MythX, Slither, or Echidna. Doing this gives you a formal verification that your contract does what you claim it does. Most contracts again stay in an immutable status after the deployment. You want to catch all the issues prior, again I stress prior, to the deployment.
Network testing helps tackle the madness of blockchain systems. This validates consensus mechanisms, simulates network partitions, load testing with substantial transaction sizes, and verifies the applications compatibility across upgrades and forks. Your application needs to be able to handle network splits, congestion, and changes to protocols.
Application testing focuses on what the client sees and how it interacts with the blockchain infrastructure. It is essential to execute end to end tests to validate the user’s journey. API testing validates the reliability of pulling and pushing blockchain data. Wallet integration testing validates the compatibility across multiple providers, while cross-platform checks verify the application works on separate technologies, desktop, mobile, and the web.
Digital assets have real monetary value, and transactions don’t go in reverse, so security testing is critical. Penetration testing is the way to simulate threat actor attacks, and manual code review helps identify bugs automated tools might miss. You can’t put full faith into automated tools, they just don’t identify everything. However, bundling with manual processes helps to identify and eliminate these issues. Economic attack testing is done to simulate market manipulation and flash loan exploits, and doing this exercise proves your application is resistant to these. Governance testing ensures the integrity that decentralized decision-making works by preventing malicious actors from subverting the system.
Blockchain applications are impacted by heavily complicated regulatory landscapes that change dramatically depending on the jurisdiction. Financial services compliance hits the hardest:
Miss any of these compliance checks and you're looking at violations and serious penalties.
Data protection and privacy regulations confuse things because blockchain systems often handle sensitive personal identifiable information (PII). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is an EU law that sets strict rules for processing personal data. In the EU it is required for testing data handling and user consent processes. California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) stresses confirmation of consumer privacy rights. Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and Brazil's General Law for the Protection of Personal Data (LGPD) each bring their own unique testing requirements. You will need to confirm compliance globally.
Another layer to increase the complexity of testing are Industry-specific requirements:
Each industry brings regulations you need to test thoroughly.
It would be easy if you just offered your web application to one jurisdiction but how will you make money without giving it to the globe? You don’t! So cross-border consideration creates one of the biggest headaches for blockchain technologies. Applications are rarely country specific and facilitate multiple jurisdictions concurrently. Due to this you need to test sanctions compliance against the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Testing cross-border payment compliance validates adherence to international money transfer regulations.
Due to the decentralized nature of blockchain apps compliance gets very complicated and messy.
Sophisticated testing validates compliance across multiple regulatory frameworks all at once.
The architecture of blockchain systems is inherently cross-disciplinary, drawing on principles from computer science, cryptography, and economics, in contrast to the more uniform technology stacks of traditional web applications. Not only are you working with APIs and front-end interfaces but then you add wallets and decentralized ledgers into the mix. Testing blockchain networks and the supported wallets, the compatibility of cross-platform compatibility, synchronization of data in real-time, and state management (Offline and Online states).
The architecture of blockchain systems is inherently cross-disciplinary, drawing on principles from computer science, cryptography, and economics, in contrast to the more uniform technology stacks of traditional web applications. Not only are you working with APIs and front-end interfaces but then you add wallets and decentralized ledgers into the mix. Testing blockchain networks and the supported wallets, the compatibility of cross-platform compatibility, synchronization of data in real-time, and state management (Offline and Online states).
Stakes are high, technology is complex, and regulatory compliance keeps growing. Organizations that need to invest in blockchain penetration testing today will flourish in tomorrow's decentralized economy.